HELP PHOTOSTUDIOUS

Kindly please take the time to donate! All funds donated goes back into running the website, avoiding advertisements and help create meaningful content. 

« Fujifilm Instax 200 Camera Review | Main | Yashica T4 / T5 Super Scope Review »

Rolleiflex 2.8F Review

You can see a lot of reviews about this camera but I will make my own about how I feel about this camera. What I love about this camera is its single focal lenght. The 80mm f2.8 lens lets you concentrate on the picture. You do not need to change lenses to see if you need a wide angle or a telephoto lens, pretty much you are stuck with one lens. This has an advantage of letting you look more into the quality of the light you have and the composition of the picture. 

Rolleiflex 2.8F Review

Caption: I use this camera occasionaly for street photography, Here is my setup minus the camera bag

Another advantage of this camera is the use of 120 film. Now you can have a Rolleiflex 2.8f shoot 220 film but my version shoots 120 film. The reason why I love to shoot 120 film is because of the size of the negative. It beats a digital full frame sensor anytime because of the shear size of the 120 negative. Also the 6x6 frame is very pleasing to the eye and is perfect for fine art pictures and portraitures. 

Honestly, I really don't like the weight and carrying my Rolleiflex 2.8f around for street photography. It is just too nice for me to be carrying a nice camera to be honest I do not really want to drop a camera older than me. But I still do since I love how and currently studying Vivian Maier's pictures and body of work.

Now you ask "where can I buy this camera?" There are plenty of stores that offer this camera at a fair price. One of them is KEH What I like about KEH is that you can return the camera if you are not satisfied with it. So if you are new to Twin Reflex Cameras you can test drive the camera and see for yourself if you like it. Another place is eBay. These cameras on eBay costs around $1,000-$3,000 depending on the quality of the camera. A fairly used one would cost around $1,000 while a mint version would cost above $3,000. 

Here are pictures of the camera with the leather case.

Here are sample images that I took:

The film that was used was Kodak Tri-X and Kodak 320TXP

Contact Sheet - Don's Photo Equipment

Untitled

Untitled

Reader Comments (2)

I have a 1962 2.8F bought from a fellow Camera Club member and have done a lot of weddings with it -- yours seems to be in MINT CONDITION as it just came out of the box from NEW -- even the underside of the strap is clean !! How do you get such MINT Cameras as I believe you are in Manila -- I go to CEBU quite often and visit Cebu Images Camera Club.

August 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPeter Elgar

Hi Peter!

Having the Rolleiflex 2.8F has been a challenge for me doing Street Photography but I never really thought about using it for a wedding. Seems like it is a good idea!

I would not say my camera is in Mint Condition. I have been using this camera for about 6 months now and I do take care of it. Notice the small paint chip on the side of the camera, maybe I would rate it at excellent plus condition.

I highly suggest to use the leather case whenever you use the camera out in the street. This prevents it from getting paint chips at the side of the film advance. I use another leather strap so that is why the brown leather strap in the photograph looks fairly new. I just happen to get it at a great price from a seller from a camera show.

I used to live in Manila but I am in Texas now. I do visit from time to time. I bought this camera online but I do a couple of test before I fully accept the camera. I'll probably talk about it in the future post = )

Best,
Wilfredo

August 4, 2012 | Registered CommenterPhotoStudious

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>